⏱00:00 0/5 answeredScore: 0
Sign up to save this score to the leaderboard.
📖 Read the passage, then answer the questions below

Quantum meruit, meaning "as much as one has earned," is a remedy allowing a person to recover reasonable payment for work genuinely done or services genuinely rendered, in circumstances where there is no fully enforceable, express contract fixing the exact amount to be paid, or where an existing contract has broken down in a way that makes suing on the contract itself unavailable or inappropriate. It is a restitutionary remedy, aimed at preventing one party from being unjustly enriched by accepting the benefit of another's work without paying a reasonable amount for it.

The remedy typically arises in several recurring situations. First, where work is performed under what both parties believed to be a valid contract, but that contract is later found to be void, unenforceable, or otherwise incapable of being sued upon directly, a party who has genuinely conferred a benefit through their work may recover a reasonable sum for it. Second, where a contract for a fixed lump sum exists but the other party wrongfully prevents its complete performance partway through, the party who was ready and willing to perform may recover a reasonable sum for the work actually completed before being prevented from finishing. Third, where a party voluntarily accepts partial or substituted performance of a contract, knowing it falls short of what was originally agreed, a reasonable sum may be recoverable for what was actually accepted and used. Fourth, where services are requested and genuinely rendered with no express agreement on price at all, a reasonable sum may be recovered for the value of those services.

Quantum meruit does not apply where a party has simply, and without justification, abandoned a contract partway through of their own accord; a party who voluntarily walks away from a lump-sum contract without lawful excuse generally cannot recover anything for the incomplete work left behind, since the remedy exists to prevent unjust enrichment, not to reward a party's own unjustified failure to complete what was promised. Nor does it apply where a party has fully performed under a valid, enforceable contract that itself fixes the exact price payable; in that situation, the party must sue on the contract itself for the agreed price, rather than seeking a separate, open-ended reasonable sum.

Where quantum meruit does apply, the amount recoverable is not the contract price originally agreed, but a reasonable sum assessed according to the value of the work actually done or the benefit actually and genuinely conferred on the other party.

Question 1

Assertion (A): A party who voluntarily abandons a lump-sum contract without any lawful excuse can still recover a reasonable sum under quantum meruit for the incomplete work left behind. Reason (R): Quantum meruit exists to prevent unjust enrichment, not to reward a party's own unjustified failure to complete what was promised. Which of the following is correct?

Question 2

A supplier delivers a batch of custom-made furniture that falls short of the exact specifications originally agreed in a fixed-price contract, but the buyer, fully aware of this shortfall, voluntarily accepts and begins using the furniture anyway rather than rejecting it. Can the supplier recover a reasonable sum for the furniture actually accepted and used?

Question 3

A worker performs specific tasks for a homeowner under what both genuinely believed at the time was a valid, binding contract. The contract is later found to be legally void due to a defect neither party was aware of at the time. Can the worker recover a reasonable sum for the work genuinely performed, despite the contract itself being void?

Question 4

A contractor fully completes a renovation project exactly as required under a valid, fully enforceable contract that specifies an exact fixed price for the entire job. The homeowner refuses to pay this specified price, arguing instead that the contractor should be limited to whatever a court considers a merely "reasonable" sum for the work. Is the homeowner correct that quantum meruit, rather than the contract price, should govern here?

Question 5

A supplier delivers goods that are somewhat different from what was originally specified in a contract, and the buyer, without ever actually inspecting or using the goods, immediately rejects the entire delivery outright and refuses to accept any part of it. Can the supplier recover a reasonable sum under quantum meruit for the rejected goods?

Sign up to save this score to the leaderboard.
📚 All Quizzes
Browse every category and see the full list of quizzes on BriskQuiz
→