Critical Reasoning: Assumptions, Arguments, and Inferences Quiz — 5 Free Questions

📖 Read the passage, then answer the questions below

A city council is considering a proposal to replace all short-haul municipal bus routes -- those under five kilometres -- with a fleet of shared electric bicycles. Proponents argue that most short trips within the city currently taken by bus could be completed just as quickly by bicycle, since traffic congestion slows buses far more than it slows cyclists on dedicated lanes. They further argue that electric bicycles produce no tailpipe emissions, require far less road space than buses, and cost a fraction of a bus fleet to purchase and maintain.

Based on data from a three-month pilot in one neighbourhood, the city's transport committee has concluded that replacing short-haul bus routes with shared electric bicycles would reduce both average commute times and the city's transport budget, without reducing the number of residents able to complete their daily commute.

Question 1

Which of the following is NOT mentioned in the passage as an advantage of electric bicycles over buses?

Question 2

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the specific claim about reduced commute times?

Question 3

Assertion (A): The committee's conclusion, based on the passage, is that replacing short-haul bus routes with shared electric bicycles would reduce commute times and the transport budget without reducing accessibility. Reason (R): The three-month pilot study directly measured accessibility outcomes for elderly and mobility-impaired residents across the entire city. Which of the following is correct?

Question 4

The committee's argument assumes which of the following?

Question 5

Which of the following best describes the relationship between the pilot study and the committee's conclusion?

📚 All Quizzes

Browse every category and see the full list of quizzes on BriskQuiz

→

About Critical Reasoning: Assumptions, Arguments, and Inferences

CLAT's Logical Reasoning section also tests critical reasoning directly: a short passage lays out an argument, and the questions that follow test whether you can identify its conclusion, its assumptions, and what would strengthen or weaken it -- no prior knowledge of the topic is needed, since every answer follows from the passage itself.

This quiz works through a single original argument about a city transport proposal, examining every angle CLAT actually tests: the argument's main conclusion, the assumptions it depends on, evidence that would strengthen or weaken specific claims within it, what can be validly inferred, and a weakness in its reasoning.

The twenty questions include an Assertion-Reason question and a multi-statement combination question alongside the dominant strengthen, weaken, and assumption format, keeping the same variety CLAT itself uses across a single passage.

Only five of the twenty questions are shown on any single attempt, so replaying this quiz brings a genuinely different set of questions rather than the same five memorised by rote.