Critical Reasoning: Evaluating a Self-Checkout Proposal Quiz — 5 Free Questions

📖 Read the passage, then answer the questions below

A regional supermarket chain is considering a proposal to replace half of its staffed checkout lanes with self-checkout kiosks in every store, keeping enough staffed lanes open for customers who prefer them or need assistance. Proponents argue that self-checkout kiosks let customers with only a few items complete their purchase faster during busy periods, require less floor space per lane than a staffed checkout counter, and free up staff to restock shelves and assist customers on the sales floor instead of standing at a register.

Based on a three-month trial in one store, the chain's operations committee has concluded that installing self-checkout kiosks chain-wide would reduce average checkout wait times and lower staffing costs, without increasing the rate of unpaid items leaving the store.

Question 1

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the claim that unpaid items would not increase?

Question 2

Which of the following most accurately summarizes the overall structure of the passage?

Question 3

Which of the following can be most reasonably inferred from the passage?

Question 4

Which of the following most accurately describes a weakness in the operations committee's reasoning?

Question 5

Assertion (A): The operations committee's conclusion, based on the passage, is that installing kiosks chain-wide would reduce wait times and staffing costs without increasing unpaid items leaving the store. Reason (R): The three-month trial directly measured theft rates and staffing costs across every store in the chain. Which of the following is correct?

📚 All Quizzes

Browse every category and see the full list of quizzes on BriskQuiz

→

About Critical Reasoning: Evaluating a Self-Checkout Proposal

CLAT's Logical Reasoning section tests critical reasoning directly: a short passage lays out an argument, and the questions that follow test whether you can identify its conclusion, its assumptions, and what would strengthen or weaken it -- no prior knowledge of the topic is needed, since every answer follows from the passage itself.

This quiz works through a single original argument about a retail chain's operations proposal, examining every angle CLAT actually tests: the argument's main conclusion, the assumptions it depends on, evidence that would strengthen or weaken specific claims within it, what can be validly inferred, and a weakness in its reasoning.

The twenty questions include an Assertion-Reason question and a multi-statement combination question alongside the dominant strengthen, weaken, and assumption format, keeping the same variety CLAT itself uses across a single passage.

Only five of the twenty questions are shown on any single attempt, so replaying this quiz brings a genuinely different set of questions rather than the same five memorised by rote.