Critical Reasoning: Evaluating a Telemedicine Proposal Quiz — 5 Free Questions

📖 Read the passage, then answer the questions below

A regional hospital network is considering a proposal to replace routine in-person follow-up appointments for patients with well-controlled chronic conditions with video telemedicine consultations, for patients living more than thirty minutes from the nearest clinic. Proponents argue that video consultations take less time out of a patient's day, reduce the need for patients to arrange transportation or take time off work, and allow doctors to see more patients in the same number of clinic hours by freeing up in-person appointment slots for more urgent cases.

Based on a four-month trial involving patients with well-controlled diabetes at one clinic, the hospital network's quality committee has concluded that replacing these follow-up visits with telemedicine consultations would reduce missed appointments and free up clinic capacity for urgent cases, without reducing the quality of care patients receive.

Question 1

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the quality committee's conclusion?

Question 2

Which of the following best expresses the quality committee's main conclusion?

Question 3

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the claim that care quality would not be reduced?

Question 4

Consider the following three statements based on the passage: I. The quality committee's conclusion is based on a multi-year study covering every clinic in the network. II. Proponents argue that video consultations free up in-person appointment slots for urgent cases. III. The trial involved only patients with well-controlled diabetes at one clinic. Which of the statements is/are true according to the passage?

Question 5

Which of the following is an assumption underlying the claim that care quality would not be reduced?

📚 All Quizzes

Browse every category and see the full list of quizzes on BriskQuiz

→

About Critical Reasoning: Evaluating a Telemedicine Proposal

CLAT's Logical Reasoning section tests critical reasoning directly: a short passage lays out an argument, and the questions that follow test whether you can identify its conclusion, its assumptions, and what would strengthen or weaken it -- no prior knowledge of the topic is needed, since every answer follows from the passage itself.

This quiz works through a single original argument about a hospital network's care-delivery proposal, examining every angle CLAT actually tests: the argument's main conclusion, the assumptions it depends on, evidence that would strengthen or weaken specific claims within it, what can be validly inferred, and a weakness in its reasoning.

The twenty questions include an Assertion-Reason question and a multi-statement combination question alongside the dominant strengthen, weaken, and assumption format, keeping the same variety CLAT itself uses across a single passage.

Only five of the twenty questions are shown on any single attempt, so replaying this quiz brings a genuinely different set of questions rather than the same five memorised by rote.