Cognitive Biases & Judgement Quiz — 7 Free Questions

Question 1

What is the name for the tendency to overestimate how well one's inner states, nervousness before a speech, a concealed lie, mild disgust at a dish, leak out and are read by observers?

Question 2

What did Daniel Kahneman name the slow, deliberate, effortful mode of thinking that is called on for multiplying 17 by 24, filling in a tax form, or checking the validity of a complex argument, and that runs on limited attention and tires quickly?

Question 3

What metaphor describes the general human tendency to conserve mental effort, reaching for the quickest, least demanding way to reach a judgement and avoiding hard thinking unless it seems clearly necessary?

Question 4

What is the name for the unshaken confidence in one's own predictions that persists even after being shown that they are no better than chance, described by Kahneman from his army days assessing officer candidates whose later performance his team could not predict?

Question 5

What is the name for the conviction that one sees the world objectively and without bias, so that people who disagree must be uninformed, irrational or acting in bad faith rather than simply seeing things differently?

Question 6

What is the name for reasoning that is steered, without the person's awareness, toward the conclusion they want to reach, so that evidence supporting a favoured view is waved through while evidence against it is held to a far tougher standard?

Question 7

What is the name for the finding that people judge a past experience almost entirely by how it felt at its most intense moment and how it felt at the end, largely ignoring how long the good or bad feelings lasted?

📚 All Quizzes

Browse every category and see the full list of quizzes on BriskQuiz

→

About Cognitive Biases & Judgement

This quiz is about the ways human judgement goes wrong in predictable patterns: the two modes of thinking, the shortcuts the mind uses to answer hard questions, the systematic biases in how we handle probability, belief, memory, other people, risk and choice, and the methods that can push back against all of it. Ninety-five questions in five packs, each describing a bias, a heuristic, a fallacy of reasoning or a decision-making effect and asking you to name it from four choices of the same kind, then explaining it. It is a knowledge quiz.

The first pack covers the fast and slow modes of thought, bounded rationality and satisficing, and the core judgement heuristics, availability, representativeness, anchoring, affect and recognition, together with the conjunction fallacy, base-rate neglect, the gambler's and hot-hand fallacies, the clustering illusion, the planning fallacy and the peak-end rule.

The second pack covers biases of belief and knowledge: confirmation bias and motivated reasoning, the backfire effect and belief perseverance, hindsight bias, the curse of knowledge, the Dunning-Kruger effect and the illusion of explanatory depth, overconfidence, illusory correlation and the illusory truth effect, the availability cascade, the Barnum effect, the Semmelweis reflex, the illusion of control and cognitive dissonance.

The third pack covers how we judge ourselves and other people: the fundamental attribution error, the self-serving bias, illusory superiority, the spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency, optimism and pessimism bias, the halo and horn effects, naive realism, the bias blind spot, the just-world hypothesis, the Pygmalion and golem effects, and the third-person effect.

The fourth pack covers decisions about risk and money: prospect theory and loss aversion, framing, the endowment effect, the sunk-cost fallacy, mental accounting, the decoy effect, status quo bias, the certainty and pseudocertainty effects, hyperbolic discounting, the identifiable victim effect, choice overload, the bandwagon effect and the IKEA effect.

The fifth pack covers errors with samples and probability and the fight against bias: survivorship and selection bias, the regression and sharpshooter fallacies, the law of small numbers, scope insensitivity, the prosecutor's fallacy, the placebo and nocebo effects, the outcome bias, the ostrich effect, normalcy bias, the contrast and focusing illusions, rosy retrospection, reference-class forecasting and debiasing itself.

The wrong answers are always other biases, heuristics, fallacies or effects of the same kind. About thirty-five of the ninety-five questions carry a photograph of a neutral object, dice, a coin, a balance scale, a stopwatch, a model brain or a microscope, chosen because every option is the same sort of thing and the picture cannot point to any of them. The work draws on Kahneman and Tversky's research programme and standard reference summaries of it.